Back to essay index

On Being Naked



Having convened, we deliberated upon the subject of nakedness. Although sentiments were widely varied, we were in concordance regarding a simple definition of the subject. Nakedness is the natural condition of man, yet this state is aberrant in society both because of notions of decorum and because of the elements, which our body cannot withstand. This austere portrayal of the topic does not offer sufficient insight into other roles of nakedness and clothing in society. After some reflection, Matt hypothesized that, in America, attire is utilized not to conceal bareness, but to allude to what is beneath it. Nakedness is exploited as a means of manipulation, not concealed on account of indecency. Admitting to that being the case, I maintained that the fundamental function of apparel is nonetheless insulation, and consequently we may frequently do without it. To corroborate this, a proposition was made that a child might be raised with no concept of the impropriety of nudity. Although not very plausible, that experiment could convincingly display the degree to which clothing is necessary. Further purposes of garments in society were then pondered during the discussion. Self-expression appeared to be a prominent function of apparel for some individuals, as it permits more variation in the size, form and color than the human body. Despite consensus concerning the subject matter, the conclusion of our exchange was disenchanting. The rationale of clothing is to enhance the utility of the skin, yet in America, clothing, as Matt aptly put it, is "more about taking it off than putting it on." America, a clothed society, dresses to emphasize nakedness.



This essay is Copyright (C) 2000 Alexey Spiridonov. All rights reserved



Back to essay index